The corporate controlled media is losing more and more credibility each and every day attempting to defend the official story of the 9/11 attacks. Former Minnesota governor Jesse Ventura who has been promoting his new book "Don't Start The Revolution Without Me" on various media outlets has gone public asking serious questions about the official 9/11 story. Ventura has raised several questions about the attacks including how three buildings all fell at free fall speed in one day due to fire. This is despite the fact that no other steel framed building in the history of modern engineering has ever collapsed this way under those circumstances. In addition, the NY Sun is reporting that Richard Falk an official on the UN Human Rights Council is calling for an investigation into the neo-conservatives role in the 9/11 attacks. As the official story continues to collapse, the corporate controlled media is losing an increasing amount of credibility on this issue.
During an interview with Jesse Ventura on the Hannity and Colmes show, Sean Hannity lied to the viewing audience saying that no engineers have gone public with different views on the collapse of the three buildings. This is despite the fact that there is a group called the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth who question the official story of how the buildings fell. The group currently has 309 members all of which are employed in either the architecture or engineering fields. Hannity desperately tried to claim that hot fires brought down those buildings when it is physically impossible for jet fuels to burn hot enough in order to cause a steel framed building to collapse at free fall speed. There has never been a case where a steel framed skyscraper has collapsed at free fall speed due to fire damage. The 9/11 Commission wants us to believe that this happened three times in one day which is absolute bull.
On top of that, CHQR radio host Rob Breakenridge posted an article attempting to counter the points that Ventura makes in questioning the official 9/11 story.
From Breakenridge's article:
Ventura obviously thinks this sounds very clever, but there's one point on which he's factually incorrect: it was more than three buildings. The twin towers (1WTC & 2WTC) obviously collapsed, as did 7WTC - the three buildings Ventura cites. What he neglects to mention is that 3WTC (Marriott Hotel) and St. Nick's Cathedral also collapsed that day.
First off, the Marriott Hotel did not collapse like WTC-1, WTC-2 and WTC-7. The Marriott Hotel was actually cut in half and the infrastructure still stood following the collapse of the Twin Towers. This would make sense because this building was located in between the Twin Towers.
The St. Nick's Cathedral was a four-story building and cannot be compared to the collapse of a 47-story building like WTC-7. WTC-7 was a large building and almost half the size of WTC-1 and WTC-2. Paul Joseph Watson from Prison Planet sums up Breakenridge's absurd comparison nicely.
The humble church building is like an ant compared to the colossal south tower, of course it would have been crushed when the south tower collapsed. How on earth can Breakenridge draw a parallel between this tiny building and a gigantic skyscraper that was nearly half as tall as the twin towers?
What Breakenridge fails to mention is that WTC-7 which collapsed at free fall speed in approximately 6.5 seconds around 5:20 PM EST in the afternoon was located much farther away then the Marriott Hotel. The Marriott Hotel despite being severely damaged from the collapse of the Twin Towers still stood. So how does it make any sense that WTC-7 collapsed at free fall speed due to residual damage from the Twin Towers? WTC-7 had minor fire damage and basic common sense and logic dictates that it could not have fallen in the fashion it did unless explosive devices were used.
He even cites the NIST report as proof that WTC-7 couldn't have collapsed with the use of explosives. What's interesting about this conclusion is that the NIST report doesn't even mention the collapse of WTC-7. He also cites other widely debunked reports that endorse theories in violation of basic laws of physics. The entire article is a joke and not based in reality.
Between this and Richard Falk going public and calling for an investigation into neo-conservative involvement in the 9/11 attacks, it is clear that the corporate controlled media is being completely discredited on the subject of the 9/11 attacks. All they can do now is lie and deceive in the hopes that people won't look into the fraud of the official story for themselves. It is no wonder that Hannity's web site is barely getting more traffic than alternative news sites like Blacklistednews.Com and Roguegovernment.Com. Hannity is a professional con-artist who gets paid to mislead the American people into accepting the false left-right political paradigm. This is despite the fact that he is a radio and TV host that gets broadcast on major national networks. This must be embarrassing for Hannity, but maybe if he told the truth about 9/11 and quit being an apologist for the treason and criminality of the current establishment power structure his web site traffic would go back up.
The lies of the 9/11 attacks will be exposed and with it so will the corporate controlled media's deception on this and many other significant issues. The people who are covering up the truth about these attacks have just as much blood on their hands as the people who implemented the attacks. It has given the excuse for the Nazis in Washington DC to implement their plans for perpetual war and a draconian militarized police state here in the United States. The truth about 9/11 will hopefully help the people of the world defeat the Fourth Reich's plans for a New World Order.
